SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 | ISSUE 30•07
The Dalai Lama was arrested on assault and
battery charges after punching and kicking a New York Post photographer outside Studio 54. Shouted the enraged Buddhist: "You want to
eat camera, picture boy?"
NEW YORK—An angry and visibly intoxicated
Dalai Lama was arrested early this morning after assaulting a photographer outside
the newly revamped Studio 54 discotheque in Manhattan.
Charged with assault and battery, the
Buddhist leader, whose real name is Gejong Tenzin Gyatso, was released on
$1,500 bail. The incident marked his third brush with the law in as many weeks.
According to witnesses, the Precious
Sovereign, 61, who had been drinking heavily all evening, punched and kickedNew
York Post photographer Mike Pallas several times after Pallas attempted to
take his picture exiting the famed disco.
"As soon as he saw that camera, he
just went off," said bouncer Todd Gehr, who was guarding the exit at the
time. "I grabbed him by his saffron prayer robe and pulled him off
[Pallas]. He tried chanting for a minute, but then more flashbulbs started
popping, and he completely lost it again."
Witnesses say that instead of backing down,
Pallas made the mistake of ridiculing the central belief of Lamaist
Buddhism—namely that, through reincarnation, the same soul has occupied the
bodies of 14 successive rulers.
"That did it," Studio 54 patron
Larry Hoffman said. According to Hoffman, the Dalai Lama then yanked Pallas'
camera away and wielded it threateningly at him, shouting, "You like
picture? You want to eat camera, picture boy?"
The Dalai Lama spent seven hours in a
Queens, NY, jail cell before being released on $1,500 bail.
Signs of trouble came hours earlier, when
the 14th religious and temporal ruler of Tibet shouted repeated requests for
"Bush! I want to hear plenty more Bush!" When the club DJ responded
by playing KC and the Sunshine Band's "Shake Your Booty," the monk
threw a shotglass through the control booth and invited the DJ to "step
outside and kiss the five fingers of enlightenment."
In addition to the charges against him, the
Dalai Lama was cited for resisting arrest. At first, he refused to give his
real name, claiming to be "the protector, the emanation and the presence
on earth of Chen-re-zi," the Buddhist personification of divine
compassion. "And if you not believe," he added, "you let me out
of these cuffs and you get one-way ticket to Nirvana plenty quick."
When asked where he was born, he responded,
"In 1936 in Chhija Nangso, Tibet... and also in 1876 in Lhasa, Tibet...
and also in Nai-tung, Tibet—" before being gagged and taken away.
Two weeks ago, the Tibetan leader was
arrested for driving while intoxicated, though his lawyer maintained his
client's high spirits were due solely to a "very satisfying night of
meditation." Last Friday, he was stopped in his 1994 Lexus by a New Jersey
state trooper for "making gestures to a police official that had no
connection with the Noble Eightfold Path." Both times he was released on
bail.
From The Onion (campus humor
magazine) Volume 30, issue 7,
article on front cover, between articles
"New Solar System Discovered Four Feet from
Earth", and
"Posters of Naked Women Fail to Draw Real Naked
Women to Dorm Room".
Most, but not all readers, will
understand that the above is a piece of humorous irreverence which (presumably)
was not intended as disrespectful of H. H. the Dalai Lama. I did once receive
an email message along the lines of "How dare you make fun of the Dalai
Lama!" — clearly from someone who views His Holiness much as a devout
Catholic views the Pope. I replied saying that, from what I know of H.H. he
would not be offended by this so why should she? And I wished her success in
her progress through the ten bhumisof bodhisattvahood.
However, with the passage of years,
one has to wonder about the Dalai Lama. While apparently intelligent, wise and
compassionate (as naturally befits an incarnaton of Avalokiteshvara), he
seems somewhat ineffectual. Along with other Tibetan lamas he recites the usual
platitudes about all beings wanting to be happy (how profound!), and how we
should all be compassionate toward each other (love those liars, cheats and
thieves!) and renounce all violence both in thought and deed, but what has he
ever really done to merit the award of his Nobel peace prize? It is not enough
simply to be an object of veneration.
So, given his intelligence and enormous sense of compassion, why doesn't the Dalai Lama question the leader of the free world [then George W. Bush] about the downside of globalization? About "Star Wars II" and the Bush administration's flagrant disregard of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty? About the unlawful attack on Iraq? Civilian body counts? Why doesn't he even pose such questions rhetorically in the media? Could it really be that this esteemed 68-year-old monk is so focused on inner change ... that he hasn't done his homework on the big political issues? When it comes to geopolitical and global economic matters, is the Dalai Lama living in peaceful ignorance in the suburbs of reality?— Adrian Zupp, Why Won't the Dalai Lama Pick a Fight?
Perhaps the
answer is that, for Buddhists, the world is basically an illusion, unreal
compared to the ultimate truth of nirvana and shunyata,
not worth fighting about because, after all is said and done, it doesn't
really exist.
Or for those who prefer a more
mundane answer, perhaps he knows which side his bread is buttered on. Cash cows
are, after all, sacred.
On 2006-03-31 "Pete"
wrote from Alaska:
You must be one of the 97% of Americans, who grew up staring at a TV before even entering school age. Too bad. At that rate, you'll never catch up to the likes of the Dalai Lama and will, therefore never be able to comprehend his actions or non-actions. I hope you'll get some drift if not The drift sometime during your life.
Sorry, Pete, when I started school TV
had not even been invented, so you began your comment with a false assumption.
And then you continued with some stupid vacuous assertion about "The
drift". You are not exactly a good advertisement for American school
education.
As for the Dalai Lama, the obvious
moral issue at present isAmerica's actions toward Iraq. For twelve years
the U.S. andBritain imposed economic sanctions against that
country, resulting in the unnecessary deaths of a million Iraqis. About this
gross immorality did we hear anything from the Dalai Lama?
Well, yes, after twelve years we did.
See His Holiness the Dalai Lama's views on war and Iraq
conflict, where we read (11 March 2003, prior to the American
invasion of Iraq):
The Iraq issue is becoming very critical now. ... But what can we do? What can we do when big powers have already made up their minds? All we can do is to pray for a gradual end to the tradition of wars. ... Okay, now, let us pray that there be no war at all, if possible. However, if a war does break out, let us pray that there be a minimum bloodshed and hardship. I don't know whether our prayers will be of any practical help. But this is all we can do for the moment.
So "all we can do is to
pray". Unfortunately His Holiness's prayers did not prevent the U.S. from
invading Iraq two weeks later, embarking on an illegal, immoral and
unjust war which has resulted in suffering to the Iraqi people on a scale which
most Americans seem incapable of understanding.
Six months after the invasion the
Dalai Lama made further comments about Iraq. The New York Times claimed
that the Dalai Lama had said that it was too early to tell whether the Iraq War
was a mistake. His Holiness corrected this in an interview with Amy Goodman, His Holiness The Dalai Lama Speaks
Out On U.S. Foreign Policy, Against the Invasion of Iraq and 9/11,
where he says he wrote a letter to George W. Bush after 9/11, urging him not to
respond to violence with further violence. (Of course, the Dalai Lama could not
know that Bush himself was part of the cabal which produced the mass murders of
9/11.) An admonition to non-violence is fine, but totally misses the root cause
of the problem, which is that America is run by psychopaths who have
been placed into power within the context of a corrupted political system which
builds on the ignorance and stupidity of the American electorate. But such
undiplomatic comments would never be uttered by His Holiness, who seldom
departs from the tired old boring platitudes of Buddhist doctrine. Politely
requesting a psychopath such as George W. Bush to actmorally is totally
useless.
On 2007-10-17 in Washington DC, before an assembled multitude of
the great and the good, the Dalai Lama accepted the Congressional Medal of
Honor from the blood-stained hands of Bush, thereby demonstrating that the
acclaimed "tolerance" of the famous "spiritual leader"
extends to the actions of war criminals and mass murderers. In his acceptance
speech he said not one word, of course, in criticism of the psychopath by whom
he had just been "honored" (some honor!). Not one word about the
suffering of the Iraqis as a consequence of Bush's illegal, unjust and immoral
military aggression, not one word about the sixty years of suffering of the
Palestinians at the hands of the Israelis, subsidised by the United States to
the tune of $3 billion dollars a year, and not one word about the fascist state
over which Bush presides, whose capitalist exploitation of most of the world is
responsible for the poverty,
hunger and ill-health of billions of people. No, just some cute philosophising
about self and no-self. The Dalai Lama is (or at least, appears to be) a nice
man, kind and compassionate, but as a player on the stage of the world he is an
inconsequential fop. He is irrelevant, except as an object of veneration by millions of naïve,
gullible Western Buddhists — and as a useful tool with which the Americans can
piss off China.
Unfortunately the number of those naïve, gullible Western Buddhists has greatly
increased in recent years, resulting in the lamas acquiring more money and
influence by which to pursue their "buddhocratic" goals (see below).
The Dalai
Lama is a great and charismatic spiritual figure, but a poor and poorly advised
political strategist. When he escaped into exile in India in 1959, he declared himself an
admirer of Mahatma Gandhi’s nonviolent resistance. But Gandhi took huge
gambles, starting the Salt March and starving himself nearly to death — a very
different approach from the Dalai Lama’s "middle way", which
concentrates on nonviolence rather than resistance. The Dalai Lama has never
really tried to use direct action to leverage his authority. ...
The International Campaign for Tibet, based in Washington, is now a more powerful and effective force on global opinion than the Dalai Lama’s outfit in northern India. The European and American pro-Tibet organizations are the tail that wags the dog of the Tibetan government-in-exile. ...
Tibet was effectively a sovereign nation at the time of the Communist invasion and was in full control of its own affairs. But the battle for Tibetan independence was lost 49 years ago when the Dalai Lama escaped into exile.
— Patrick French, He May Be a God, but He’s No Politician, The New York Times, March 22, 2008
Right. The Dalai Lama fled the field
and China won by default.
While one can sympathize with the
Tibetans' desire for freedom from Chinese hegemony (a desire which now has no
chance of being realized), those who in 2008 protested Chinese control of Tibet
during the relay of the Olympic torch were unwittingly working on behalf of the
Western psy-ops boys, who seek to embarrass their geopolitical rival China and
to deflect attention from the US's own abysmal human rights record. More
amazing hypocrisy from a government which has used its immense military
apparatus to bomb and invade two much weaker countries since 2001 and has
directly caused immense suffering and the documented deaths of over a million
people there (not to speak of the millions that it killed during its bombing
and invasion of S.E.Asia in the 1960s and 70s).
And it's not just a matter of
hypocrisy. The US-orchestrated campaign against China in the run-up
to the Olympics was a propaganda tactic designed to weaken China's
geopolitical position. This was explained in detail by Michel Chossudovsky in
his China and America: The Tibet Human
Rights PsyOp.
Since the Tibetan government-in-exile
is funded by the National Endowment for Democracy, which is a CIA front
organization, it's not an exaggeration to say that the Dalai Lama is on the CIA
payroll (as he was also in the 1960s, at $1.7 million a
year). So looks like it's true — nothing is sacred anymore. Gee, what a shame!
Welcome to the real world.
Oh, by the way, did you know that the
Dalai Lama is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations?
The view of the Dalai Lama among the many pious followers
of Tibetan Buddhism in the West is that of a saintly figure whose main teaching
is the cultivation of compassion and tolerance and who regularly (and vapidly)
says such things as, "Because we all share this small planet earth, we
have to learn to live in harmony and peace with each other and with
nature." (And how to contribute to that? Simple — just become a disciple
of the lamas and follow their instructions!) However it is not generally known
that the Dalai Lama's presentation is a façade which conceals the real aim of
himself and the other lamas, which is to establish a world-wide
"Buddhocracy" to rule over the entire planet. This was revealed by
the Dalai Lama's premier disciple Robert Thurman in a speech he made at a
conference in Bonn in 1996. At this conference the
carefully considered objective of the assembled Tibetologists was demolished by Thurman. In a powerfully eloquent speech entitled "Getting beyond Orientalism in approaching Buddhism and Tibet: A central concept", he sketched a vision of the Buddhization of our planet, and of the establishment of a worldwide "Buddhocracy". Here he dared to go a number of steps further than in his at that stage not yet published book, Inner Revolution. The quintessence of his dedicated presentation was that the decadent, materialistic West would soon go under and a global monastic system along Tibetan lines would emerge in its stead. — Victor & Victoria Trimondi, The buddhocratic conquest of the west
The pious followers of Tibetan Buddhism in the West may
be content to be ruled by lamas, just as pious Muslims may be content to be
ruled by mullahs, but the rest of us prefer to retain our individual liberty
and our freedom to live our lives as we see fit, unconstrained by self-serving
and self-styled "authority", whether or not garbed in holy robes.
A very smart writer!
ReplyDeleteIf only he could have known the Tibetan Buddhist teachings by H.H. the Dalai Lama are focused on sexual techniques as the highest path to liberation!
Well, it's good that there are people who are able and willing to see the truth behind political manipulation.
Thanks for your highlight!
DeleteThanks for your supports.
ReplyDelete